paradox-by.com

Artemis birds and the paradox of time Eoin Colfer – Book Review

admin — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:00:32 +0000

It is still unclear for most of us know why Harry Potter became a sensation among readers and not Artemis Fowl (although a strong fan base, the series later, do not deny). We should be happy that we have so much in the series about the same time. Of course there are some similarities between the two characters. They live in a world of magic, if it’s a secret (the world of magic) and must stay that way. The way that JK Rowling wrote Harry Potter is a bit conservative, but Artemis Fowl innovations find their way out of trouble (and creates anarchy).
Do not miss the fun
Artemis Fowl and the Time Paradox is the sixth book in the series and is just fun and nothing else. The only drawback is that it would be great if you have read the previous parts of the series – otherwise it would take time to get used to the characters. You would be missing on the fun too (if you do not know what happened in previous books).
The Secret World will remain secret
In the first book, the hero finds a secret world, where he captures Captain Holly Short, to the magical place (and ransom of his future projects) to leave. Most of the minor characters began their lives in the first book in the series itself, so many jokes and dialogues determined by what happens in the previous parts, so you need to read these books if you enjoy the paradox of time completely.
Amazingly Supporting Actor
All the secondary characters are just incredible, as Butler (Artemis Fowl’s bodyguard), Julius Root (Chief Captain Holly Short), Foaly (support staff) and the dwarf Mulch Jaws flatulence. In a book of faces Koboi Opal Artemis, who is trying to provoke a war between man and man. Over time, Artemis Fowl has become more mature, and his arrogance has fallen since the days when he was a new character in the first book in itself was.
Do you know of his younger self?
The relationship between Captain Holly Short and the hero has to be complicated. He was also in trouble later, because most fairy tales sold supercomputers to the Mafia. The time paradox story is at the point just after the Lost Colony, where again the hero of an adventure, but it is three years too late (as expected). Spelltropy – His mother has been diagnosed with a rare disease that was almost human once been. The only cure is killed by the silky sifaka lemur of Madagascar animals, because Artemis Fowl, a few years ago. The only way to save his mother, go back in time and with his younger self to get to that animal.

The primary key Paradox and Why

admin — Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:23:32 +0000

The essential paradox and why primary.
See # 1, atheist and existentialist paradox:
If you are a pure function of the chemistry of life existential then these DNA chemistry of life created a being purely material must be an active and lively, and related sub-consciousness, where the dream state regularly sometimes questions can be non-material and non- chemical derived are described and does not manifest from an existential experience, examined, studied, and for many a greater sense of meaning and purpose. Planet of the existential basis of material created a being that 1 / 3 of it’s life goes into a non-existential exercise that has little or nothing to do with the business of mechanical survival of species and evolution.
See # 2, the paradox of creationists:
If we are a creation of an omnipotent being, he has limited ourselves in danger to be set completely dependent are fully carried out without end and constantly just to get the life of a daisy chain of chemical reactions. Omnipotent being so completely disguised the origin of the underlying spiritual life under almost incomprehensible complex chemistry of life, that no direct research in science or some other method has an answer to the question of what and why of creation is given here.
Interestingly enough, if you see # 1 and # 2 can cut all into a coherent logic of the cosmos to be created so that the dizzying complexity of the chemistry of life, a sign of the Almighty Being working for a force or with unlimited power, a system have created so complicated and yet they are usually working all the time. It also offers greater satisfaction, deeper and more useful answer to the problem of existential millions of pure and so the cosmos created utilitarian, many of the creatures that literally can not survive without a regular dose of rest and contemplation of the ideas and concepts that have no origin in existence to have.

The Importance of Being Real – The Abilene Paradox

admin — Mon, 09 Jan 2012 14:16:49 +0000

It is a fervent and dusty day in July in Coleman, Texas. Four people are waiting for the heat, drinking lemonade in the shade of a farmhouse porch. At one point, someone suggests, removed to Abilene, 53 miles to get a bite in the cafeteria instead. Others think it’s a crazy idea, but they say nothing and walk. To all the way to Abilene in a car without air conditioning through a sandstorm, a mediocre meal and drive back to Coleman, hours later, tired, hot and happy.
When they return home, did not show the first, but because they thought the others were eager for the unit. Of course, this lack of communication was the fault of another person.
Here is the paradox of Abilene, a phenomenon of group dynamics is first identified by Jerry Harvey of George Washington University in 1974. The paradox is that people goes a bad decision, knowing it was a bad decision in the first place. The result is the opposite of what uninspired from the start, center support, ideas, and the loss of time and money on results that fall short of expectations should.
On the way to Abilene
We have all experienced Abilene paradox, especially in decision-making meetings. We strive to make a decision to agree, only to find to make, in our innermost being, he did it only for what others around the wishes and views.
If you said, even in such situations, “Who cares, it will be alright, what you choose,” or “I think I’ll go with the flow”, which is on the way to Abilene. We assume that others really want to go to Abilene, though not, but we decided to go anyway. And if everyone has the same false assumptions that is, the action is something that nobody wants. We agree that a group but as individuals, we have regrets. One can say that this is an absurd situation.
Why do many people actually support the things that go against what they want? What happened to the people open to ideas and concepts that contribute in roles? A rare bird in the groups.
According to Harvey, in groups, to express their true beliefs creates a degree of anxiety. In the case of maintaining one’s own integrity and self-respect to speak your mind, or compromise your values ??and stick with what you think is the consensus?
The fear comes from the magical belief that something catastrophic will happen if you do not post their true thoughts. “Oh, I’ll get fired if I do that. I’ll get called a rebel. I’ll look like a fool. I’ll be uncomfortable.” Because I believe that these things happen when you speak your mind right, just not honest about what they really think. These magical consequences excuse to relax.
And what do these negative consequences and make magic? The alienation, separation, isolation, anxiety, that are powerful, underlying, so powerful that we act against our own interests to the risk of not “part” of something to avoid. Of course, doing what ends up in Abilene.
The commitment is unhealthy, you go Down the Road
But it is the commitment of professional life? We are not against our own interests, if we go together? In his new book, the commitment trap, Elizabeth Doty draws a line between healthy commitment that is necessary to reveal the fulfillment of the goals and commitments to unhealthy beliefs and values. Where commitments accumulate unhealthy conflict within the head can lead to stress and many trips to Abilene (and alienation, isolation or ostracism feared in the first place!).
His approach is to recognize when they are pressured to go through the rules, the play violated their faith and / or common sense, and a different game play to be true to yourself, no matter how difficult the circumstances. The key to playing this game different is to question their assumptions. Is it really this decision in the interests of the group? Are other people involved with this set or just feel pressured to participate? What are the costs for me without progress, including the cost of my self-esteem and the ability of others to trust me? And finally, do you think really fired, getting ostracized, excluded, or if I focus on group support to achieve their goals?
In his book, Elizabeth shows many examples of professionals who had not questioned their assumptions and discovered the consequences of speaking up as bad as they first appeared, at least not in comparison with the dust and heat of Abilene.
So how do you know your team is on the way to Abilene? Here are some pointers:
Soft and ambiguous language. It is the vagueness and opacity in the order of the day against the clear and descriptive words? The uncertainty leads to a poor understanding leads to confusion about how to react. Collateralized debt obligations, anyone?
Missed opportunities. Do people from the meetings by saying something like: “What I really meant was …?” We respond individually and privately brought an entirely different opinion is expressed on the computer.
It’s no fun. Are the meetings are formal, serious, process and intimidate something? Is there room for spontaneity in every speech?
The Authority plays. Beware of the person in authority, the subtly different ideas, adds his / her own likes and uses strong language in the home key points without reply in the group.
Looking for a scapegoat. We were all in a lousy decision, we are all guilty. Under these circumstances, it is a good sign for the debt. This is a sign that they have been and perhaps still in Abilene.
The low turnout. Are there people in the meeting is not? Why?
Under questioning and investigation. What is the relationship between the formulation of questions to get ideas?
Knowledge about the process. Do people realize that they produce agreements that nobody really wants?
The point is that it is necessary to intervene in their true perspective, what. To listen to the people, be diplomatic, chooses his words carefully and back up your opinion on logic and data. People are not ideas that were forced to accept to hear.
Visit us too often in Abilene
Unfortunately, the Abilene Paradox in real life, where surrogate decision has serious consequences played. A highly publicized example was the Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961. This is what a CIA agent, wrote about the final stages of decision making.
“It’s hard to believe that, in retrospect, that the President and his advisers the plans for a large scale, complicated military operation that lasted for over a year, could be revised in four days and still felt a strong likelihood success. It is also surprising that the agency agreement that simple. “

How to lose weight and stay slim forever – The paradox of the nutritional

admin — Sat, 07 Jan 2012 14:16:41 +0000

Have you ever struggled with your weight? Have you tried different diets? Do any of them really work? If you’ve ever struggled with their weight if your weight is always a time back when he started dieting was, read on.
Did you know that in 2010, seven in ten Americans are expected to be overweight? Among other Western countries is a little better, but there are more overweight people everywhere.
This message means that all diets, pills, treatments have not helped.
But the good news is that three out of ten Americans know how to be thin. If you know why the others do not learn from them? Why learn about overweight people do not lean on the? In fact, some people learn from the gut, and they know that losing weight has nothing to do with starvation diets, pills, supplements or calorie counting to do. It is easy to lose weight, but you must listen to the people who know.
Best-selling author and nutritionist David Wolfe tells people that “the answer to permanent weight loss is right under our noses the whole time.”
In his own 15 years of personal experience, he told of losing people, there is no need to go hungry, counting calories or spend hours in the gym, fit into the clothes. He is convinced that dieting is a waste of time, and that most people fail to undergo the diet because the diet is against human nature.
Diets are not sustainable and are against our human nature. David Wolfe teaches that there are four keys to permanent fat loss and by those who have lost weight and kept it remains divided.

The plagiarism paradox and famous authors accused of plagiarism

admin — Thu, 05 Jan 2012 13:54:40 +0000

Each person in a popular profession a bad dream you never want to be met. For doctors, this is a negligence claim, while for the writers who are accused of plagiarism. But for a writer can often two types of fear – of being accused of plagiarism or plagiarism in his work.
However, when it comes to plagiarism, it is often very difficult to prove, unless sections, paragraphs and scenes are lifted directly from another author’s work. Many authors use the works of other authors as a source of inspiration. Therefore, under these circumstances can be accused of not being a writer of plagiarism. Today, almost every issue that have been published and have been studied by other authors. Thus, two authors on the same subject not be accused of plagiarism write.
Stephanie Meyer, author of the New Moon, has been of plagiarism by a college roommate of age, which is based the idea for New Moon on a short story that was written by the two accused said. Therefore, there is a paradox of plagiarism. Is it plagiarism if an author’s ideas of another author or a person?
Then there is the case of a student named Kaavya Viswanathan at Harvard, who wrote a book titled How Opal Mehta Got Kissed, Got Wild, and has a lifespan. The book was immediately given a success and the author is a six-figure sum for the rights of the film. But soon began to emerge that had gripped Kaavya plagiarism. She had neglected plots and passages from his book, first raised portions Secondly, The Princess Diaries, and even works of Salman Rushdie and Sophie Kinsella. As a result Kaavya lost book deal, and the cast of the film. She tried, with the words that she has the ideas from these books to defend, but not plagiarize anything. Any plagiarism was absolutely intentional. However, this was not the spot to sit well and stayed.
Also J.K. Rowling, Harry Potter became famous accused of plagiarism by Nancy Stouffer. But this claim was thrown out of the playing field when it was learned that Stouffer had fabricated evidence and lied to. But while Harry Potter is very similar to The Secret of Platform 13 by Eva Ibbotson. In this case, not mediated by Ibbotson Rowling ideas from his book, the feeling that all writers take ideas from each other.
Some of the other famous authors of plagiarism by Stephen King, TS Eliot, Jack London, Doris Kearns Goodwin, Dan Brown, and Olaf Olafsson accused. Even the great William Shakespeare has been accused by the ideas of others, and they are selling.

Patenting paradox in the world of Web site development and promotion tools

admin — Tue, 03 Jan 2012 13:53:00 +0000

The idea of ??patenting an invention does not sound funny for like-minded business. But more and more inventors website development and promotion software and solutions for the popular trend and not patent their inventions.
So, if the employer decide (owners of professional services or website development software or inventors creating a social networking solution), the risks in the interest not only to their inventions, the patent must be taken very seriously.
Let’s do a flashback in the short history of this movement is not patentable.
Perhaps the first company that started this approach to practice was Google. The reader may immediately object say, they saw hundreds of patents for Google. But further investigation will show that Google is patenting only independent approaches, possible interpretations, possible improvements of the algorithm, equations, and much more interesting than anyone in the world (but the team of Google, of course) can be reliably detected, as this or that part of the puzzle of great influence to the Google algorithm (or something – for short).
To make it in simple worlds Google “patent puzzle.” Imagine the Google search engine ranking algorithm consists of millions of puzzles. Google is patenting some of these puzzles and the “new puzzle” to be or not in the algorithm (no one can guarantee that this or that “puzzle” has no value) are included.
What is the advantage of this approach? – With this approach, SE-optimizers very “hard” in the search for answers to these questions:
- How it all, what puzzle fit? – How can you know that this very “puzzle”, the patented algorithm has the great is the price?
You can use your whole life on the evidence and trying to figure out to spend the truth about the algorithm.
And now imagine that Google’s algorithm glorious patented. So everyone can get this information by law – it is in the public access. The name it – this would result in the creation of software for a variety of websites, free tools, website development, website development and promotion solutions to create. And all this is handled by Google’s algorithms. This could be the end of the idea of ??search engine because they know everything they like to manipulate their algorithms.
Should I patent? What should I patent?
Everything depends on the type of product. For example, you sell training course on how to websites only useful tips, etc. Once purchased, the people look to the general information and may make copies. For this type of product patents is a necessity, because it makes you feel safe and at least one legal reasons for the vicious blow duplicators.
But if you sell something that people use, but can not in the black box and see exactly how it works – no longer recognizable. In this article I mentioned Web site development and promotion software, tools and solutions. But, any kind of program or software that is a great piece of program code. And with this kind of products is another story.
We invite the public into the discussion with tips on how to join to avoid patents and is still highly protected products.

The difference between men and women: the paradox of love

admin — Sun, 01 Jan 2012 13:43:47 +0000

The myriad differences between men and women are perhaps one of the great ironies of love … As a classic example of what it refers to the marital relationship and long-term men often expect a woman who falls in love will never change, men love their women to stay as it is! Women, on the other hand tend to want to change her husband for her to be a better person, and love.
For example, for men, before they have a serious relationship or thinking about marriage, and that men look at the present time, which means that a man, evaluate and ask yourself in your head, if meets your criteria? Whether they all have the look you? Could you imagine to be with her for a long time? Or in the case of marriage, love and could not imagine, stay with her for a life?
So when a man finally decided, with a woman in a serious relationship or marriage, simply means that he really loves and appreciates everything about them. Specifically, he really hopes that they will always remain as it is in the coming years. This is especially true when it comes to marriage, for most men marry, if a woman decides, it means that he thought she was just perfect for him in every way.
Quite different and unlike men, women and look to form expectations for the man who will be in the future, if a woman chooses to tend to a man, it’s almost as if they will invest their future in it. Why? Because women are more sensitive to age, and also take a more often than men when they enter into marriage. No matter how hard and cruel as it sounds, if you ask ten men, because when decisions marry a woman, as you age? Assuming they were all honest, the answer is probably not if they are options to ensure as to marry a younger woman. I can not explain why, but that’s how most men think.
When a woman marries a man because he believes in them, she believes to be its potential, the potential for change, the potential to be a good husband, her potential to become a better person. It is their potential to change for the better bets. Better than anything that can be an ideal husband and their perception.
The conflict between men and women from different angles is exactly how and when conflicts begin to accumulate in the marriage. From their perspective, one might think, “I gave this man my youth, my love, my all, I invested my precious years and my future in it, so why not just change me and the best, why not for our love change’s sake, why not spend more time trying to communicate with me and talk about feelings? Why can not more time with me on the weekend? Instead, he becomes a meeting place with friends … ”
From the perspective of people who could say “I love the way she is and always was. I would not change it because I love everything about them, to be myself and be happy! Are So why is expected that to another person, change the I? I was like before the marriage, and I will not change, so why can not I be myself and stay as I am, why I can not play the ball go, Fishing to play poker, or playing video games as I used with my friends on the weekend, as I always have done for years, why must everything change after marriage? ”
I am a man, I can not speak for everyone, but I think in this particular subject, for most men, when a woman tries and tries to change it, press it, mold into another person, which is not, but would one of their great pains and nightmares are, trust me, I’ve been there.
My open and honest advice to women who are considering marriage, ask yourself the following questions:
1) If (insert name), remains as it is now and never change a bit after the marriage, they still love him?
2) What I can imagine spending your whole life with this man exactly the same?
3) When I asked (enter your name) in exchange for something that is one of his bad habits, such as throwing his dirty socks in the house or your routine weekly poker nights with friends when he is not like this I’m ready to give without feeling remorse and despair?
If you love and you love, and you answered yes to these questions, you are very lucky! Marry him, he is the ONE!
For men, the truth, I know exactly how you feel when a woman tries to change, and if not, she kindly reminds you to be a real man, and must act as a good husband …. But if you look at it and think about the perspective of women, the truth is that only women neglected the expectations for a man who truly loves, if she loves you, then ….
If love keeps commitments is questionable, but for the marriage, whichever is currently in a marriage or that someone had been there to say, his marriage, the complete mutual understanding and make ready with the other needs, demands and expectations to negotiate.
For men, my best advice for all we can do to meet your expectations, I’ll bet that once she sees that you are really your best to compromise and the best it can be like a man because you love they will be loved! For women, the feeling of love and loved to be the key essences for a happy marriage. It’s all for the sake of love.

did you know about the theory of the French Paradox Resveratrol?

admin — Sat, 31 Dec 2011 12:20:13 +0000

Here you can learn about the French Paradox resveratrol and proanthocyanidins, other nutrients. The researchers are still on the importance of screening and the value of the plant compounds, resveratrol and many others. You may end up getting our new miracle drug. But if people begin to absorb more nutrients in your diet, you may not need drugs. All that remains to be seen, it is what we know.
All over the world, was that some populations have a lower incidence of heart disease. In some cases the reason is obvious, diet rich in plant foods and low in saturated fat and reducing exposure to environmental toxins. Paradoxes are in the population where there is a lower incidence of heart disease despite a lifestyle or eating habits that are known to poorly observed expected for the heart.
In southern France there is a low incidence of heart disease, but the average diet is relatively rich in saturated fats. This is the French Paradox resveratrol has been said to explain how it was found that in some varieties of red wine.
In Japan there is a low incidence of heart disease, although there are high rates of smoking. Catechins found in green tea is believed to explain this paradox. These are two of the most famous paradoxes, but there are others.
The researchers’ goal was to identify the components of the diet to reduce the risk of heart disease, cancer and other life-threatening diseases. Another goal was to plant materials, to identify the treatment or cure of diseases. This is not a new goal. Aspirin was originally extracted from willow bark. Taxol, an important cancer drug, was originally isolated and extracted from the Pacific yew tree.
This is all very interesting, but what to do with the French Paradox resveratrol is thought to explain? Once the researchers determined that the connection, verify its various activities began. They learned that to kill a cancer cell, extending the life of heart cells, reduce inflammation and suppress the effects of a high-fat diet on blood cells and reduces blood sugar.
Pharmaceutical companies are currently working on a new drug for the treatment of type II diabetes. Which contain resveratrol.
Therefore, researchers have learned much about the connection of the French Paradox resveratrol, as we learned to find the original set. Several groups have learned something else. It is not enough resveratrol in red wine Declaration of heart-protective effect. They believe that the proanthocyanidins, or a combination of the two compounds in order to provide the services.
There are some excellent supplements on the market contain. If you do not drink red wine, you might be interested supplements. Just make sure that the product does not contain too much. Researchers are not through the study of the safety of high doses. 20-50mg per day is sufficient. I hope that explains the theory of the French Paradox resveratrol and gave him something to think about. If you have a minute’s time, please take a look at my website now.

The Fermi paradox: the theory that extraterrestrial visitation supports

admin — Thu, 29 Dec 2011 12:20:08 +0000

The Fermi paradox (by the physicist Enrico Fermi) is briefly as follows. Extraterrestrial intelligence using the latest technology and interstellar flight capability exists. Sub-light interstellar flight is not against the laws of physics. Adopt the mantra of quantum physics, “something that is not forbidden is compulsory.” How long does it take to every corner of our galaxy, the Milky Way to explore by sub-light interstellar flight, is a small fraction of the age of the galaxy. There are at least one of the generally valid reasons to go there – the survival of the species. No star lives, no solar system forever. We (Planet Earth) can not disguise the foreign exploration and / or colonization. So where is everybody? [Analog earth life forms like bacteria, ants and cockroaches, birds and humans, of course, explored and colonized the planet earth in small amounts at the time that the earth has given himself.] So again, where it all for?
I hear the cries of objection, opposition ‘now. It is obviously too much and takes too long to get from there (wherever that is) from here. Well, life would not be easy! Seriously, if you think about it for a while, I seem to protest too much!
First, foreigners have a natural relationship for a long service life, our terrestrial bipedal carbon-based. There is no natural law that limits the intelligent life forms exist only three and ten guests.
Second, advanced aliens have perfected several techniques can overwinter. Put your boat on autopilot and the dream of long-distance traffic.
Third, there is the old form of sci-fi chestnut, interstellar spacecraft several generations. Although I think it is a difficult concept, especially for the exploration, it can not be that far if the goal is interstellar colonization.
Then there are the bio-technology, the return to an organic body into something that is more machine than flesh and blood, perhaps as Doctor Who Daleks. Given the advances in artificial body parts for humans, although the hip prosthesis or dentures or dental fillings, even banal, which is of course a valid option.
Fifth, why stop there? Send 100% machines – artificial intelligences as a cyber-”body” or small robots or androids or machines of nanotechnology. One thing is obvious what data “Star Trek: The Next Generation” or something similar to the original Cylons. . Thinking Battlestar Galactica “from the savings of not to support with life and other critical agency needs to provide biologics We have done a first step, and thus there is no fundamental difference between a Cylon and our Pioneer 10 and 11; .. . our Voyager space probes, it is only a Cylon much more challenging is the day that our pioneers and Voyager will be something like a Cylon, or one of dozens of similar “essence” in the literature of science fiction. Since the AI ??is almost immortal (with respect to the flesh and blood), which offers the arguments of the travel time, and comfortable fit possible environments relative path (colonization?) greatly expanded.
Finally, perhaps, just perhaps, is a kind of warp drive, faster than light ship possible. Foreigners whose science is thousands of years more advanced than we could have gotten to Einstein’s speed limit. I would not bet money for it, but I would not give less open to the possibility, however slight. On top of that, theoretically, but also allows “gateway” between distant points of our universe to other universes – wormholes and black holes. Maybe, just maybe, has an advanced alien civilization the means to manipulate objects and forces, to facilitate easy travel in space (and time perhaps). An excellent science to hardcore science-fiction novel that is not based on pseudo-techno-babble that this Carl Sagan, “Contact” shows.
So again, where it all for?
The responses include (but are not really limited to) the general concepts, which indicate …
No, never and never will. What’s wrong with that? Well, given the distance (100,000 light years in diameter) and timelessness (more than 12 billion years at least) of the total area of ??our galaxy, the chances that we have the proverbial IT, the only one, is highly unlikely. It is a serious violation of the principle of mediocrity or the Copernican principle.
We are the first kids on the block, not the New Kids on the Block. What’s wrong with that? Once again, the probability that should be in all the vastness of our galaxy, the Milky Way, the first, extremely unlikely. Our solar system is no more than 4500000000 years, our galaxy is much, much, much, much bigger than that.
Exist, but not on the exploration of space concerns, to seek a new life and new civilizations. You do not want to go there, or try to communicate. You want to be left alone – isolationists. What’s wrong with that? That may be one or more foreign cultures, but true to extrapolate and suggest that it applies generally to all extraterrestrial civilization is illogical.
To boldly go, but not yet arrived. What’s wrong with that? Once again, we do not need much time to explore the entire galaxy. It would be a godsend if we had not been noticed and recorded in the database from another civilization.
You are here, but it leaves us in peace. What’s wrong with that? Here also could be that true for one or more foreign cultures suspect, but can be extrapolated and that it applies in all areas seems illogical to me again. There is no such thing called explain zoo hypothesis to the Fermi paradox. It is both “Prime Directive” from Star Trek combined with the concept of a zoo. Aliens (the keeper) not interfere with us (although, of course, from time to time, the keepers, to interact with animals (humans) in the zoo), you can not interfere one with us, but probably wouldn ‘t allow us the cage (ie, probably the limits of our solar system – I mean that they are entitled to travel to the moon) to escape.
You are here and interact with us and our environment – that no UFOs? What’s wrong with that? Absolutely nothing!
UFOs are a perfect answer to Fermi’s Paradox!
Some recommended reading on the Fermi Paradox:
Hart, Michael H. & Zuckerman, Ben (eds.), Extraterrestrials: Where are you, Pergamon Press, NY, 1982?
Hart, Michael H. & Zuckerman, Ben (eds.), Extraterrestrials: Where are they? [2 Ed], Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995:
Verma, Surendra, why not here? The question of life on other worlds, Icon Books, Cambridge, 2007:
Webb, Stephen, where it all for? Fifty solutions to Fermi’s Paradox and the problem of extraterrestrial life, Copernicus Books, New York, 2002:
Library science, retired.

Economics: an economic paradox, expenses Versus Savings

admin — Tue, 27 Dec 2011 12:12:33 +0000

As individuals, we tend to want to save and invest as much money as possible. In a capitalist system with a semi-market economy, every person is a free agent, and a participant in any way or form. One of the few problems with capitalism, unfortunately, is that good and bad behavior is rewarded, and the good being done by many personal behavior is often punished by the group as a whole. Most-202 Macroeconomics students can explain this paradox of saving money and not spending much enough. I will also do so now.
The crux of the matter is that fuel the U.S. economy. We need dollars are spent and the velocity of money to be quite high. If not, are the products that are bought and sold, and thus people are unemployed, and unemployment will be high. This goes directly against the tendency to want to save money, and act with prudence in personal finance. However all is not lost in this dilemma.
The money saved and invested the same corporate investment. S = I. What saved America as a whole is available to be borrowed to fuel business investment and thus the new economic activities and new product development and production. Economists know and understand the multiplier and the different effects. The trade-off costs are compared to the savings. (Consumption versus investment) have both, and are ideal to maximize optimal levels of each of the economic activity, unemployment and improve the balance or the inflation and GDP.
All families who want to save money and get rich. Unfortunately, while capitalism is the best system on earth, the income of a family is often the other loss. If you are the save your hard earned money, is that the money withdrawn from circulation, except that (creating more money) capital investments for the company and the bank and the use of the agent used. This money, but you have to invest, it is necessary to invest in new businesses, if people do not save too much and consumed. (The unemployment rate is therefore between the neighbors.) On the other hand, if we are spending a lot, you will need a certain level of savings, it is for business investment, maintain production to sustain the demand. Hence the paradox.
Increased spending in the long run requires more savings for business investment and expansion, but higher investment (savings) is not required, not more spending. However, further savings and investments are required to use and growing! This is our market and the capitalist economy and its paradoxes and dilemmas true … Sometimes, apparently all the benefits are used by less caution, unless you are looking for a dozen years ahead .